Showing posts with label Translations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Translations. Show all posts

Friday, November 27, 2009

Rav Itchie Mayer Morgenstern on Parshas Vayeitzei

Below is an excerpt from the English translation of the drasha given by Rav Itchie Mayer Morgenstern on Parshas Vayeitzei. Below that are links to download the full Hebrew and/or English translation texts in pdf format...
“And Yaakov went out from Be’er Sheva and went toward Charan. And he touched upon the place, and he tarried overnight, for the sun set suddenly. And he took from stones of that place and placed them beneath his head, and he lay down to sleep in that place.”[1]

Uniting the Stones

Rashi explains that Yaakov placed the stones beneath his head to form a protective barrier since he was afraid of wild animals. The stones began to bicker among themselves, since each stone wanted the exclusive honor of supporting the head of the tzaddik. Hashem immediately joined them together as one stone, as we see from the verse that follows: "וַיִּקַּח אֶת-הָאֶבֶן אֲשֶׁר-שָׂם מְרַאֲשֹׁתָיו"—“And he took the stone that he had placed beneath his head...”[2]

Rashi explains that the words, “And he lay down to sleep in that place,” are meant as a qualifier—Yaakov lay down to sleep in that place, but during the entire duration of his fourteen-year hiatus in the yeshiva of Shem and Ever, he did not lay down to sleep. [This means that during his time with Shem and Ever, he did not sleep in a designated place, but rather would fall asleep briefly over his studies when he had no more strength to learn, and only in order to renew himself for further study.]

The second statement of Rashi seems very difficult. How can we say that Yaakov, the vehicle for the Tiferes of Atzilus,[3] [which is the spiritual source of Torah[4]] stopped learning and went to sleep? Surely, just as he never forgot Torah for an instant for the fourteen years he was in yeshiva, he would never knowingly disrupt his thoughts from their involvement in Torah? The answer to this question is that even Yaakov’s sleep was an aspect of Torah. The Tikkunei Zohar teaches that this is the deeper meaning of the words of the verse, "וַיִּשְׁכַּב בַּמָּקוֹם הַהוּא"—“And he lay down in the place.”[5] The word ישכב—“lay down”—spells יש כ"ב—“there are twenty-two.” This refers to the twenty-two letters of the Alef Beis that form the Torah through which Hashem created the world. [In the Sefer Yetzirah, these are called “twenty-two stones”—the essential building blocks of creation.] Yaakov went to sleep in the place of these twenty-two letters.

This is similar to the statement of Rav Michel Zlotchover regarding his slumber. “I have never been in the state of oblivion that most people call sleep. Whenever I go to sleep I have an aliyas neshamah, my soul ascends to the upper realms on high.”

The deeper works explain that the verse, "אָכֵן יֵשׁ ה' בַּמָּקוֹם הַזֶּה וְאָנֹכִי לֹא יָדָעְתִּי"—“Surely Hashem is in this place, and I knew it not”— indicates that until that time Yaakov had not understood just how much a person can grasp of Hashem while he sleeps.[6]

[1] Bereishis 28:10-11
[2] Ibid., 28:18
[3] Zohar I:157b
[4] Ramak in Tomer Devorah
[5] Ibid., 28:11
[6] See the Baal Shem Tov Al HaTorah and the Ohev Yisrael on this verse.

CLICK HERE for Toras Chochom on Vayeitzei
shirat devorah. Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to subscribe in Google Reader.

Sunday, July 19, 2009

Getting Back to Basics with R' Avraham, Son of the Rambam - New Translation

Rabbi Yaakov Wincelberg was kind enough to send me his recent translation of a classic, but little known, sefer that he recently published through Feldheim, The Guide to Serving God, which is a translation of the sefer Hamaspik L'Ovdei Hashem by Rabbeinu Avraham ben HaRambam.

The section of the Sefer Hamaspik that is extant today is only a small portion of the original sefer, although even that section is quite thick. From reading the translation and the introduction where R' Wincelberg explains the process he went through to translate this sefer both from its Hebrew version and the original Judeo-Arabic text, it is apparant that the translator was very thorough and this book was obviously the work of many years.

I would definitely recommend that others get this classic Mussar sefer, in this very accessible form and translation. I also would like to point out a couple of things that struck me from the first few chapters.

One interesting thing is that R' Avraham ben HaRambam certainly assumes that readers are already familiar with his father's understanding of the accounts of angelic visits to human beings from Chumash. While discussing the mida of generosity (Nedivus) in Chapter 5, he teaches how one should behave toward guests based on how Avraham and Lot conducted themselves with their angelic guests in their "visions." The fact that R' Avraham ben HaRamabam uses the term "visions," rather than referring to Avraham and Lot's actual encounters with the melachim teaches that he holds like his father in Moreh HaNevuchim 2:42 that angels cannot actually appear to human beings.

Another interesting thing I found was how R' Avraham really takes you back to basics. It's very easy for some of us to get caught up in the beauty and inspiration of very deep teachings, but we should never lose sight of the fact that all of those higher levels are only true when they follow the basic road common to all Jewish people, which means keeping halacha and learning regular Torah shebechsav and Torah Shebaal Peh. A life of penimius Hatorah (Ohr) can only exist when it is in the context of a life of someone who learns Torah and keeps halacha (the kli), the only kind of life capable of containing the Ohr of Penimius HaTorah.

He brings this out starkly in one particular paragraph where he says that "God has criticized the absolute confusion and severe ignorance of anyone who expects to achieve Encounter* by becoming engrossed in the intimate road while ignoring the common road..." (p. 19). I think that says it all.

*R' Avraham ben HaRambam uses the word Encounter to refer to the personal, intimate and experiential relationship with G-d which is the goal of life. R' Wincelberg explains this concept in his introduction starting on page xxxiii.

I certainly recommend the sefer, which has Hebrew and English on facing pages, and great footnotes that compare and contrast R' Avraham's writings which the shitos of his father, and which bring out some of the linguistic complexity in the original Judeo-Arabic. I will certainly pass on any comments or questions to the author! Kol tuv.

Picture of the sefer courtesy of amazon.com and the picture of R' Wincelberg is courtesy of Rabbi Zweig's yeshiva in Miami Beach. Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to subscribe in Google Reader.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Don't Waste This Opportunity for the Redemption- Translation of Sudilkover Rebbe's Letter

A few weeks ago, I translated a letter written by A Simple Jew's rebbe, the Sudilkover Rebbe. In it, he discussed how we find ourselves at a very important time in the process of the redemption and how we have to daven stronger than ever that Moshiach come now, and not to waste this chance.

A Simple Jew: This Opportunity, So Ripe For Redemption, Will Be Wasted

P.S. I translated another article by the Sudilkover Rebbe very early in this blog's history. It was on the topic of the meaning of Chassidic stories. You can read that translation in two parts here:

Part 1
Part 2

Picture courtesy of artiststory.blogspot.com. Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox or here to subscribe in Google Reader.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Guarding the Covenant - Translation & Selection from Upcoming Sefer


I would like to share my translation and the original Hebrew of a small section from an upcoming sefer by a young Talmid Chocham, Rabbi Ronen Shaharabany. He wrote his first sefer on halacha, hashkafa and Kabbalah related to Nisuin, marriage. He wrote this sefer between the time he got engaged and the time he got married. Copies of the sefer were distributed to all of the guests at the wedding and I am priviliged to a have a copy of this great sefer as well. You may download the full chapter from which this selection came in THIS WORD DOCUMENT. Just "right click" on the link and select "Save Target As" to view the original hebrew Word file.


It comes out that one who guards the covenant (is careful not to stray innapropriately with his eyes, thoughts or actions) will always feel satisfied. This is because he will be a proper vessel to receive brachos and hashapa'os (Divine blessings) in spirituality and phisicality, and Hashem will always cause him to be happy. The secret of this matter is that feeling satisfied is a reward for guarding the covenant. This is because the root of guarding the covenant is from the aspect of "starving it" (as in the Gemara in Sukkah 52b "אבר קטן יש לו לאדם, מרעיבו שבע, משביעו רעב," "Man has a small organ. When he starves it, it is satisfied and when he feeds it, it is hungry."). For then, he will be satisfied and guarded. as a reward for the person starving his desires and holding onto the trait of being-satisfied, Hashem will bless him with the blessing of contentment and satisfaction, joy and every good in spirituality and physicality.

It comes out that the result of guarding the covenant, the aspect of "starving it," is that he will be "satisfied and always content with what he has in the aspect of "שמח בחלקו," being happy with what one has. (There is an amazing hint to this in that "בחלקו" is the letters of "in the portion of the letter "vav." The letter vav cooresponds to the covenant and the mida of Yesod to hint that the person will be happy because of his portion in guarding the covenant. This is also the secret of the bracha, "ברוך את ה' הזן את הכל" Blessed are you Hashem, who sustains everything. "זן," "sustains" is the aspect of satiety. and the intent is that Hashem sustains and satisfies specifically those who are in the aspect of "כל" everything, i.e. one who guards the covenant. (See later on in in the full piece, that "כל" cooresponds to the mida of Bris.) However, one who feeds [his desires] will remain hungry and will never be satisfied at all.

In contrast to this, it is known that the root of depression and sadness comes as a result of abusing the covenant. By abusing the covenant, one holds onto the powers of impurity and thereby automatically dwells in complete sadness. So too, holiness will not dwell on him and he will not be a vessel capable of receiving any hashpo'os or brachos. He will never be satisfied with what he has and he will not be happy with his portion. He will always feel empty and lacking, which is the opposite of one who guards the covenant. The secret of the matter is that all of this is a result of abusing the covenant. The root of abusing the covenant comes through trying to "satisfy" [one's desires]. Then, one ends up wanting more and more. He runs after his desires and tries to fulfill all of his wishes. The punishment from Heaven is that he will always feel "hungry," and he will want more and more and he will never be satisfied or happy with his portion, even if he would get all of the wealth in the world.


נמצא שאדם שמשמר את בריתו, לעולם מרגיש מסופק, שהרי הוא כלי מוכן לקבל את כל הברכות וההשפעות ברוחניות וגשמיות, והקב"ה תמיד משמחו. וסודם של דברים, שזה שמרגיש מסופק הוא שכר לשמירת בריתו, שהרי שורש שמירת הברית היא בחינת "מרעיבו", שאז הוא "שבע" ומשומר, ובשכר שהאדם מרעיב את תאותו ואוחז במידת ההסתפקות, ה' מברכו בברכת ההסתפקות של שמחה וכל טוב ברוחניות וגשמיות. נמצא שהתוצאה של שמירת הברית, בחינת "מרעיבו", הוא שנעשה "שבע", שלעולם מסופק במה שיש לו, בבחינת "שמח בחלקו" (ורמז נפלא לזה, ש"בחלקו" אותיות בחלק - ו', והאות ו' כנגד הברית ומידת היסוד, לרמוז ששמח על ידי חלקו בשמירת הברית. וזה גם סוד ברכת "ברוך את ה' הזן את הכל", ש"זן" הוא בחינת שביעה, והכוונה שה' הוא זן ומשביעה דווקא את מי שהוא בבחינת "כל", ששמור את בריתו (עיין לקמן ש"כל" כנגד מדת הברית), אולם המשביעו נשאר רעב ואינו ניזון מה').

ולעומת זאת, ידוע ששורש העצבות ומרה שחורה באה כתוצאה מפגם הברית. שעל ידי שפוגם בבריתו אוחזים בו כוחות הטומאה, וממילא שרוי בעצבות גמורה. וכן אין קדושה שורה עליו ואינו מוכן לקבל שום השפעות וברכות. ונמצא שלעולם אינו מסופק במה שיש לו ואינו שמח בחלקו, ותמיד מרגיש ריק וחסר, הפך מזה ששומר את בריתו. וסוד הדבר, שכל זה הוא תוצאה משום שפגם בבריתו, שהרי שורש פגם הברית הוא על ידי בחינת "משביעו", שרוצה עוד ועוד, ורודף אחר תאותיו ומנסה למלאות רצונותיו. והעונש הוא שמן השמים לעולם ירגיש "רעב", שרוצה עוד ועוד ולא יהיה מסופק ושמח בחלקו, ואפילו אם יהיה לו כל הון דעלמא.
-Dixie Yid

(Picture courtesy of afterimagegallery)

Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox.

Thursday, July 3, 2008

New, Corrected English Edition of Bilvavi Mishkan Evneh Now Available!


The new and corrected version of Bilvavi Mishkan Evneh Vol. 1 is now available in the United States! The current text has been edited by Rav Avraham Carmell, the son of Rav Areye Carmell. A good portion of it has been reviewed by Rav Moshe Weinberger as well. The first printing of this new edition is on a limited run, so you might want to get your copy now. A second printing of this new English edition is on its way in the near future as well though.

Click here to get it at Nehora!

-Dixie Yid

Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Da Es Atzmecha - Sefer Translation is Online!


The English translation to the first section of Da Es Atzmecha is online at Bilvavi.net HERE. I've added it to my permenant links in the Bilvavi section of my right side bar. Many have asked me about this so enjoy!

-Dixie Yid

Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

New English Translation of Selections from the Noam Elimelech


Received from Rabbi Tal Zwecker/Targum:

SPECIAL PRE-PUBLICATION OFFER IN HONOR OF THE YARTZEIT OF THE NOAM ELIMELECH!

ORDER NOW & GET 15% OFF THE LIST PRICE!

Open your eyes to this brilliant work. Open your heart to the compelling words and thoughts of Rebbe Elimelech of Lizhensk.

Mipeninei Noam Elimelech

A selection of teachings, stories, and parables of Rebbe Elimelech of Lizhensk

As the Rebbe of all Rebbes and the recognized third-generation leader of Chassidus, the Noam Elimelech is revered for his holiness and brilliance. His profound sefer of Torah elucidations has been diligently studied for centuries. But how many can truly understand his lofty teachings? In this groundbreaking, first-ever English rendition of selections from the Noam Elimelech's classic sefer, Rabbi Moshe Tal Zwecker has opened the world of chassidus - the world of the Noam Elimelech to the English speaking public. With essays based on the weekly parashah and various appendices, including his famous "tzeitel katan" and his stirring "prayer before prayer", every one will be deeply moved and inspired by this important and profound work.

Pre-publication orders will be processed and shipped within a week of your order. Please allow approx. 3 weeks after shipping date to receive your order.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Formerly of Oceanside, New York, Rabbi Tal Moshe Zwecker is a chassid of the Clevelander Rebbe of Raanana, Israel. He currently lives in Ramat Beit Shemesh with his wife and children. He delivers shiurim on a variety of topics, including Chassidus. Rabbi Zwecker is the founder and director of Machon Be’er Mayim Chaim, whose aim is to translate and make available the classics of Chassidus in English.

Rabbi Zwecker's website: chassidusonline.com


-Dixie Yid

Click here to get Dixie Yid in your e-mail Inbox.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 6

Click here to read the introduction. (Highly Recommended!)
This is the 6th and final part of my translation of Rav Itchie Mayer Morgenstern's Kuntres, indentifying many modern movements and Tzadikim in Yiddishkeit with their root sources in Chochma and Bina.

Rav Chaim Brisker and the Chazon Ish:
One can explain the root difference in the difference in Derech Halimud between Rav Chaim Brisker and the Chazon Ish, zy"a, according to the inner essence. (Look deeply and you will find that this explanation fits perfectly in every situation where there is a dispute between them.)

Both Rav Chaim Brisker and the Chazon Ish are considered students of the GR"A. The GR"A was the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef, who is tied to the sefira of Chochma (as we've explained elsewhere). But the father (Chochma) established the daughter (Malchus), and Rav Chaim Brisker is tied to Chochma in the way that it is Above, and the Chazon Ish is tied to Chochma in the way that it is revealed below, in the aspect of Malchus. And therefore, Rav Chaim Brisker sees every sugya with a completely new vision (since Chochma is the idea of seeing the big picture). And even though Rav Chaim sought depth and straightness of the true pshat (the aspect of the connection of Chochma to Malchus is called Pshat), in his search for Pshat, he has ascended to the root of Malchus, which is Chochma, as we mentioned before.


But the Chazon Ish views Chochma only has it is revealed down below, in the place of Malchus. Therefore, he seeks the most refined Pshat (the aspect of Chochma), but he is exceedingly exacting in the language [of the text he is studying] (the aspect of Malchus). (The Chazon Ish was Mefalpeil in the external things [since external things are discernible, like Bina], but he did not take on the way of Pilpul of building one structure on another and understanding one thing from the other, that is in the aspect of Bina. Rather, he delved deeply into the self-contained Pshat [of what he was studying]. And this is as we mentioned earlier that the light of Chochma is revealed in the place of Malchus.) (Rav Morgenstern, at this point, explained, specifically, many disputes between them [along these lines, but this is not the place to expound on that].

-Dixie Yid
Update: Avakesh has a post which supplements some of these ideas here. It's worth seeing.

Monday, June 11, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 5


Please read the introduction first. Highly Recommended.

Rebbe Nachman and the Shpoler Zaide:

I spoke on Purim night (5765-2005) at length about the idea of the holy Rebbe the Shpoler Zaide, zy"a. I said that fools say that he opposed Rebbe Nachman, and I repeatedly said that one who says that today is a fool. The Shpoler Zaide, zy"a, was the holiest of the holy, and never truthfully opposed Rebbe Nachman. (Perhaps his [R' Morgenstern's] intention is that even at the time, there were hidden, secret reasons why, as it were, there was an aspect of dispute superficially. However, today, it is impossible that there should even be an external understanding of the secrets that existed at that time, and therefore, one who, today, mentions the disputes of that time, is simply a fool)

I concluded [on that occasion on Purim] that when Moshiach comes, it will be revealed that the wedding ring of the redemption will be made from the apparent dispute between the Shpoler Zaide and Rebbe Nachman. As Rebbe Nachman said, in the future there will be much laughter from this matter. Meaning: It will be revealed that it [the apparent dispute between the Shpoler Zaide and Rebbe Nachman] will be was an aspect of the frolicking/fighting between the Shor Habor and the Levyoson, who fight together.

The interpretation of this is that it hints at this according to the explanation of the Kozhnitzer Magid, zy"a, regarding the pasuk "וזדים טבעת," (from Shiras Hayam- "You will sink the intentional sinners") that the Holy One will turn the intentional sins (zadonos) of the Children of Israel into merits and adornments (from the word טבעת/ring, which is spelled the same as "taba'ata.") Similarly, one can explain "v'zaidim taba'ata" that the wedding ring [of the redemption] will be made from this idea of the Shpoler Zaide's ["וזדים" hinting at the name "Zaide"] [apparent dispute with Rebbe Nachman].

On another occassion, he explained the idea of the fight between the Shor Habor and the Levyoson at length, and how it was an aspect of unifications "דבטישו" [help on this word would be appreciated] which will exist before the redemption between Moshiach ben Dovid, who is the aspect of Shor Habor and Moshiach ben Yosef, who is the aspect of the Levyoson

It is known that the Zaide, zy"a, was a direct male descendant of the Maharal from Prague, and the BeSh"T, zy"a, brought down his (the Maharal's) neshoma into this world (as is known according to the well known story). He [the BeSh"T] was his [the Shpoler Zaide's] Sandak, and he gave him the name of the Maharal from Prague, since the Maharal was the aspect of Moshiach ben Dovid in his generation, as is hinted to from the words of Rav Chaim Vital, zy"a. And even the Maharal, himself, hinted to this in one of his seforim (See, Shearis Noson page 398), and Rebbe Nachman was, at the beginning of his avoda as Moshiach ben Yosef, as I've written elsewhere.

Click here for part 6, Rav Chaim Brisker and the Chazon Ish

-Dixie Yid

Friday, June 8, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 4

Click here to read the introduction (Highly Recommended).

Chabad and Breslov:

I will now speak about Breslov and Chabad Chassidus. We see that they have many things in common. For example, both engage in spreading the wellsprings of Chassidus (Chabad according to the well known letter of the BeSh"T, "Eimasai Ka'asi Mar, etc." and Breslov according to the will of Rav Noson, that the main involvement should be with spreading [Rebbe's Nachman's teachings]). In this last generation, both of them are involved in Kiruv Rechokim and "making" Baalei Teshuva, and both have had to tolerate much opposition. The Baal HaTanya and Rebbe Nachman were Mechutanim (co-father-in-laws). The Baal HaTanya used to call himself the (spiritual) grandson (נכד) of the BeSh"T, like Rebbe Nachman, z"l. there are other connections, but this is not the place to expound. However, the difference between them is in the aspect of Chochma and Bina, as I mentioned.

It is explained that the holy BeSh"T was the aspect of Adam Harishon, which included all levels and all aspects, in the aspect of Keser Haklali [All-Inclusive Crown] (the Chariot of Elokim, K'vayachol). After that, all of the students of the holy BeSh"T continued in his holy way. They were pipelines and vessles to draw down the holy light of the BeSh"T for generations. However, there are many disparate lines and particular traits in them, because even though all of them were tied and reached the light of the BeSh"T. Nevertheless, each one of his holy students had his own way, from some trait or aspect, to ascend to the aspect of Keser (the light of the BeSh"T).

(Even Rebbe Nachman, z"l, despite the fact that he, on one hand, revealed many new aspects, as he said explicitly, nevertheless, there is also within him the aspect that he is continuing to reveal the light of the BeSh"T, similar [to the relationship between] the Ar"i and Rebbe Shimon bar Yochai. Even though the Ar"i revealed new things, which were not expounded in the holy Zohar explicitly, nevertheless, all of the new revelations of the Ari were a revelation of the light of the Rashbi in "new vessles." Through the "new vessels of the Ar"i we merit to receive the light of the Rashbi. It is the same thing regarding the BeSh"T and Rebbe Nachman.)

We must divide up those who followed the holy BeSh"T into four principal lines: 1) Chochma, 2) Bina, 3) Chesed-Gevurah-Tiferes and 4) Netzach-Hod-Yesod-Malchus. (Despite the fact that it is known that accoridng to Kabbalah all of these aspects include all of the aspects [as sub-aspects] , which means that there are more specific divisions [to be made] , this is not the place to expound.) (At the time of the Magid [of Mizrich], these divisions did not yet exist, because the Magid, in this respect, was the aspect of the BeSh"T...) 1) The Baal Hatanya is the aspect of Chochma. (Throughout the Tanya, he refers to the sefira of Keser as "Chochma," because his way was to ascend to Keser is through "Chochma." Therefore, he established the "shita" of Chabad whose essence is the revelation of G-dly Chochma in the Torah of Chassidus.) 2) Rebbe Nachman tied his revelation to the Sefira of Bina, as Rebbe Avraham b'Reb Nachman, z"l spoke about at length in the sefer כוכבי אור. (Even though Rebbe Nachman, himself, was the aspect of Keser, nonetheless we did not merit that the aspect of Keser should be revealed in the days of Rebbe Nachman, [but he instead] revealed in himself with the garments and vessels of Bina.)

3) The Rebbe Reb Elimelech, zy"a, and his students are connected to Chesed-Gevurah-Tiferes. Therefore, they mainly involved themselves in matters of Ahava, Yirah and Deveikus. (the way of Kotzk, Pshischa, etc. was tied to Daas Tachton, which is the inner essence of Chesed-Gevrua-Tiferes) 4) The general way of Chassidus in the later generations [has been]tied to Netzach-Hod-Yesod-Malchus. (And therefore Chassidus receives light in a way of remembering the levels of the earlier generations. And so too in their practices and commitments, etc [they endeavor to do like the Zaides and Bubbes].) But here is not the place to expound [further].

Let us return to the matter of Chabad and Breslov, who are connected to Chochma and Bina, two inseperable friends. there is much in common between them. They are both involved in repairing the world and spreading the wellsprings of Chasidus to bring the redemption closer. The idea of the redemption is related to the aspect of Keser and therefore, only Chochma and Bina, the two parts of Keser (as is apparant from the physical analogy that the right brain [Moach HaChochma] and the left brain [Moach HaBina] are within the skull, which corresponds to Keser) are involved... in bringing the redemption closer through spreading the wellsprings [of Chassidus] and "making" Baalei Teshuva.

However, there is a difference between Chochma and Bina in their method of repairing the world, which is also expressed in the two different ways they express Chassidus, as mentioned above. In Chabad Chassidus, the main Kiruv Rechokim is done through the G-dly Chochma in Chassidus. This is the way of Chochma. (In the last generation, this is also done by practical mitzvos (Mivtzo'im), in the aspect of concrete actions, even without any inner thought. This is tied to that which will be explained later, that Chochma's root is in the Ancient [Atik]. And therefore, it reveals the elavatedness of Malchus [mitzvos that are purely physical], whose end is bound up in their beginning, but this is not the place to expound on this topic) And in Breslov, Kirus is mainly done through [mekuravim] learning ways of Avoda[s Hashem], Teshuva, Hisbodedus, joy, etc., because the idea of Bina is Teshuva and the service of the heart.

[Section omitted from translation] Therefore, one who learns the seforim of Chabad receives a level of the loftiness of G-d, and the greatness of Hashem until the Infinite Light, which no mind can grasp. And one who learns the seforim of Breslov receives a feeling of closeness to Hashem and a strengthening of the feeling that Hashem is with him and beside him. This is the aspect of the revelation of Keser of "Arich," which reveals that no place is empty of Him.

This is also the secret of the words of Rebbe Nachman, who said that he wants that all of his Chassidim should come to be "like me, literally." Meaning: they should come to the aspect of Arich, where the aspect "He equates the small with the great, etc." will be revealed.

Click here for part 5, Rebbe Nachman and the Shpoler Zaide.

-Dixie Yid

Update: A Simple Jew has a guest posting relating to this topic by Rabbi Dovid Sears, which can be found here. Also, Chabakuk Elisha has a guest posting at Mystical Paths on some of the commonalities between Chabad and Breslov here.

Monday, June 4, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 3


Please click here for the introduction to this series (highly recommended).

Chassidus and the GR"A:

We will [now] speak about the dispute between the GR"A, zy"a, and Chassidus. The explanation is that the GR"A was the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef (as was stated by the students of the GR"A and received by the Maharil Diskin). One of the purposes of Moshiach ben Yosef is to wage war with the Klipa (husk) of the Erev Rav (other Jews in our midst who infiltrate illegitimate ideas from within) which gets stronger before the redemption. The klipa of the Erev Rav is the klipa of the Haskala (the "Enlightenment") whose roots were beginning in those days. In truth, Chassidus was the counterpart (ze leumas ze) of the Klipa of the Haskala. And the Klipa of the Erev Rav of the Haskala was related to the 50th gate of impurity, which is the aspect of Amalek, which is called "Reshis Goyim," the first of the nations (Bamidbar 24:20), (as the Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh said in parshas Shmos, that before the redemption there would be a strengthening of the 50th gate of impurity). Therefore, the Maskilim ("Englightened Ones"), may their name be blotted out, attempted to disseminate impure forms of wisdom which eminated from the 50th gate of impurity. (The wisdom of holiness is, l'havdil, a counterpoint to this, and is a revelation of the aspect of Keser, Crown, the 50th gate of holiness.) Chassidus was the cure that preceeded this disease because it was a revelation of the Yechida [the highest of the 5 "parts" of the soul], the 50th gate of holiness. Chassidus revealed the Holy Englightenment of the revelation of G-dliness in Chochma-Bina-Daas, which is the cure which preceeds the Klipa of the Haskala.

Therefore, the GR"A, who was related to the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef, is the aspect of the Sefira of Chochma (as we said earlier). The Sefira of Chochma pushes away the Chochma of impurity in a way of waging war, because the method of clarifying between good and evil is the job of the Sefira of Chochma, "כולהו בחכמה אתברירו. (Zohar)" And therefore the GR"A had to wage war with the Klipa of the Erev Rav. But the revelation of Chassidus, which relates to Moshiach ben Dovid, the Sefira of Malchus, whose destiny was planted at the beginning in the Sefira of Keser, is the remedy to the sisease of the Wisdom of Impurity. It is a repair and a remedy by spreading the Wisdom of Holiness. When the kingdom of Moshiach ben Dovid will be in its perfect state of repair, receiving [he'ora-illumination] from Keser, then he will be able to repair the world without the use of war. [As opposed to the time of] the birthpangs of Moshiach and the wars that preceed the redemption, which relate to Moshiach ben Yosef [before] he is included [joins] with Moshiach ben Dovid, about which this is not the place to expound). [The GR"A's job was to fight against the Wisdom of Impurity with war, under the flag of Moshiach ben Yosef. Chassidus is the aspect of Moshiach ben Dovid, post war, and is the aspect of Moshiach ben Dovid.]

Due to our sins, the GR"A confused his friend for his enemy, Chassidus for the Haskala. Therefore, Tzadikim said that had the GR"A seen the face of the Baal haTanya, zy"a, he immediatly would have retracted his dispute [with him], because he would have immediately seen that he [the Baal haTanya] was not the Klipa of the Erev Rav. And in actuality, in the generations after the GR"A, the students of the GR"A (R' Yitzchak from Volozin zt'l) and the Tzemech Tzedek zy"a fought together against the Klipa of the Haskala, which was the true Klipa of the Erev Rav.

There is an aspect that had the GR"A and the Baal Hatanya met, there would have been a unification of the two Moshiachs, Moshiach ben Yosef and Moshiach ben Dovid, and the complete redemption would have been awakened. This is because the torah of Chassidus relates to the revelation of Moshiach ben dovid (and the Baal Hatanya was a direct male descendant to the Maharal from Prague, who was a direct male decendant of Dovid Hamelech). Therefore, the Satan strengthened himself to prevent that meeting between them.

In truth, the GR"A's war was a heilig war, which did bear fruits and had positive outcomes in sublimating the Klipa of the Erev Rav for generations. [This is because] even though outwardly the GR"A waged a great war with Chassidus, the holiness of that war actualized its self by sublimating the Klipa of the Erev Rav, similar to what Rebbe Nachman, zy'a, said, that in truth, no one opposes him. And those that oppose him have painted an imaginary picture of him, and it is that that they oppose. But no one opposes he, himself. Similarly, the GR"A never opposed Chassidus, only the Erev Rav. But he thought that the Klipa of the Erev Rav was found in the form of Chassidus. But in truth, he never opposed [actual] Chassidus.

A deeper explanation: The aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef relates to the Sefira of Chochma, and Moshiach ben Dovid relates to the Sefira of Bina. Therefore, the GR"A, who was the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef, made his primary involvement with Kabbalah, which is related to Chochma. and the Baal Hatanya merited to write the Shulchan Aruch HaRav in revealed Torah and in halacha, which relates to Bina. (The GR"A never received permission from Shamayim to do this, as his children wrote in the introduction to the GR"A's explanation on Shulchan Aruch.) And just like it is received in the name of the Divrei Chaim [of Tzanz] that the GR"A was greater than the Baal Hatanya in hidden Torah, so too was the Baal Hatanya greater than the GR"A in the revealed portion [of Torah]. [remainder of paragraph omitted from translation]

Do not question, based on reality's appearence, that those who were tied to the GR"A did not study the hidden Torah, and the Chassidim did involve themselves very much in the hidden Torah. The reason is that once the unification of the two Moshiachs did not materialize, there was an aspect of shattering in Moshiach ben Yosef. Thereby, all of those tied to the GR"A distanced themselves from learning the hidden Torah. During the lifetime of the GR"A, his main involvement was with the hidden Torah, and he taught his greatest students (like the Nefesh Hachaim and the RaMa"M from Sokolov and others)the hidden Torah. After his peira, those who continued in his way stopped learning the hidden Torah, because once the two Moshiachs did not unite, there was an aspect of death in Moshiach ben Yosef. And because of this, the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef fell from Atzilus (the highest world) to Bria-Yetzira-Asiya, the aspect of the revealed Torah. However, since at the end of the day, their root is still in Chochma, their learning in the revealed Torah is in the way of "lamdanus," which is the aspect of Sod [secret] that is within the revealed Torah.

Afterwards, even the mantle of Moshiach ben Yosef and Chochma fell upon the students of the holy BeSh"T, and the Baal Hatanya transformed into the aspect of Chochma , relative to the other students of the holy BeSh"T... [translation of remainder of paragraph omitted]

By the Chassidim it is the opposite. In truth their root is from the aspect of Bina, which is tied to learning the revealed Torah. However, since they did not go out of Atzilus, (the aspect of death is in Moshiach ben Yosef, and not Moshiach ben Dovid), they are tied to Kabbalah, since Atzilus is Kabbalah. But, they learn Kabbalah, its self, in the way of the revealed aspect of secrets. Meaning: Most chassidim learn Kabbalah in a way of [practical] Avodas Hashem (since Avodas Hashem is the aspect of Bina), the exception being Chabad, who have become the aspect of Chochma, as I mentioned earlier.

One finds in the statements of some Rebbes of great Chassidic groups that glorify the superiority of the students of the BeSh"T over the GR"A, zy"a. The reason is tied to the secret that we mentioned erlier, that the GR"A was related to the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef, and the revelation of Chassidus was related to the aspect of Moshiach ben Dovid. Therefore, there is an idea of, and a need for, teaching and revealing that "Ben Dovid is at the head."

Click here for Part 4, Chabad and Breslov.

-Dixie Yid

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 2

Click here for the introduction (highly recommended)
Click here for Part 1.
Kabbalah and Chassidus:

Let us speak about the difference between Kabbalah and Chassidus, which differ in the same way as Chochma and Bina. Chochma is compared to water, which descends from above to below [top-down, principal to application] and Bina is compared to fire which rises from below to above [bottom-up, detail to principal].

This means that the revealations of the Ar”i are a revelation of Kabbalah in a way of “above to below,” i.e. from the Infinite Light [descending down] till the lowest world [Olam Ha’asiya], according to the order of the Eitz Chayim. And in this way, [Kabbalah] has an advantage because it is much better equiped to specify and explain all of the Aspects and all of the Levels. However, the drawback is that it begins from a place that is distant from the one who is lower, and the lower one has no comprehension of it. Therefore, the majority of people have no grasp of the words of the Ar”i… The holy Ar"i was the aspect of Moshiach ben Yosef, as Rav Chaim Vital said, and Yosef is the aspect of Chochma which descends from above to below. And in truth, Rav Chaim Vital should have been Moshiach ben Dovid, because he was the aspect of Bina. Therefore, he had the ability to write, and the Ar"i did not have the ability to write because Chochma is the aspect of “Light” and Bina is the aspect of “Vessels,” which are the letters of writing which contain the light of Chochma.

This is why the holy Ar"i said to Rav Chaim Vital that the verse states about him [Rav Chaim Vital], “And to you is the desire of Israel.” He did not explain what he meant. But the Komarner Rav zy”a explained that that Rav Chaim Vital had the Neshoma of the holy Baal Shem Tov (Moshiach ben Dovid). However, we were not meritorious, and the Baal Shem Tov was required to complete the revelation of Kabbalah in the way of Bina, meaning, in a way of “below to above.” [This means that he] began from the perspective of Avodas Hashem and the emotions of people to elevate people up from there to [to allow them to] cleave to that which is above. [He did this by] revealing that everything below is rooted above, and every trait within a person is a chariot of that which is above. [Merkava, chariot is the concept that we can be a mere vehicle of the One Above. Just like a car's movement is not of its own volition, but instead is merely an expression of its driver’s will, so too our goal is to be the merkava/chariot/car of the Holy One, where every thought, word, and action are merely an expression of the will of the One Above.]

[Chassidus] has the advantage that it is able to bring the whole world to this type of revelation, as reflected by the statement of Moshiach to the Baal Shem Tov, that the whole world will be able to make unifications and elevations through you. This means that a person can understand that all of his emotions that he feels in himself are the chariot of the emotions above. [This is the meaning of]the unifications and elevations which it will be possible to easily teach the whole world.

Click here for Part 3, Chassidus and the GR"A

-Dixie Yid

(Picture courtesy of AishAudio.com)

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Part 1


(Video is from Parshas Zachor with Rav Itchie Meyer Morgenstern in Mezibutz, Ukraine)

Click here for the Introductory Post.

Bnei Sefarad and the Bnei Ashkenaz (Rav Yosef Karo and Rav Moshe Isserles):

We find from Rav Moshe Dovid Walli zy"a (a student of the Ramchal) in the Likutim, that Sefardim are from the aspect of Chochma. And therefore, they love Bekiyus (bredth of study) and obtaining vast knowledge in all of Torah, like the Rambam. Whereas Ashkenazim love depth and Pilpul, like the Ba'alei Hatosafos, because they (Ashkenazim) are from the aspect of Bina.

[As I brought down in the introduction, Chochma is the aspect of general principals and Bina is the aspect of focusing on the details. Therefore, Ashkenazim, for the most part, love to focus on the details (only learning 20 blatt of 6 masechtos really really well) because they are the aspect of Bina. Whereas Sefardim focus on yedias Hatorah b'chalus because they are primarily the aspect of Chochma, which focuses on the principals, the forrest, and not the trees.]

Ostensibly, this requires explanation because reality shows that Ashkenazim are physically whiter, which relates to Chochma. [in Kabbalah, white is the simplist color without any complexity, like the general principals which characterize Chochma - this question also stems from an assumption that everything in the physical world is a mere reflection of a deeper spiritual reality, even something as mundane as the color of one's skin] While Sefardim are generally browner, which relates to the aspect of Bina. [With all of the focus on detail, there is more complexity in applying principals to the details of life - This is symbolized by brown, which has many shades mixed together, as a reflection of Bina's complex application of general principals to daily life.] But the explanation is that the Ashkenazim have the aspect of Chochma externally, but internally they are the aspect of Bina, while the Sefardim are the aspect of Bina only externally, while internally they are the aspect of Chochma... [A Penimius HaTorah section is omitted]

Therefore, Ashkenazim, during the chupa [which is used to represent our values as it is the beginning of each new home that is created] hint to the idea of "Ashes Chayim Ateres Ba'ala, The woman of valour is the crown of her husband." They reveal the loftiness of the female side, which surrounds the groom. [When the Kallah circles the Chosan 7 times, this reflects the fact that at the root of the Neshoma of Ashkenazim, the female side, the side of Bina, is emphasized and elevated.] However, [at the chupa] Sefardim reveal the elevated status of the male side, which surrounds the bride. [At a Sefardi wedding, the couple is covered by the Choson's talis, showing that the male side (Chochma) is makif (surrounds, is predominant over) the female side, because the Sefardim in their inner essence are Chochma. Therefore, they reveal the elevation of the male side. But the Ashkenazim who, in their inner essence, are the aspect of Bina, reveal the elevation of the female side. [These root natures are reflected in the Chupa because] the chupa reveals the inner essence.

Continue to Part 2, Kabbalah and Chassidus.

-Dixie Yid

Chochma vs. Bina - Practical Manifestations - Introduction


(I found this video of Rav Itchie Mayer Morgenstern on Google Video)

I am planning to do an introduction followed by a 6 part translation of an unbelievable, eye opening, unpublished Kuntres by Rav Itchie Mayer Morgenstern. I obtained this from my rebbe. The original Hebrew version can be found here. It consists of an amazing explanation of the difference between Chochma (Wisdom) and Bina (Insight), and how those two aspects of the ChaBa”D portion of the Sefiros create many of the major dichotomies in Yiddishkeit. In each of these 6 parts, I will translate the sections of the Kuntres regarding how the distinction between Chochma and Bina are the root of the differences between:

1) Sefardim vs. Ashkenazim,
2) Kabbalah vs. Chassidus,
3) Chassidus vs. the GR”A,
4) Chabad vs. Breslov,
5) Rebbe Nachman vs. the Shpoler Zaide and
6) Rav Chaim Brisker vs. the Chazon Ish.

My rebbe omitted several parts of the Kuntres which delved into Penimius HaTorah more deeply. I will also abstain from translating certain paragraphs when I am unable to truly capture their meaning. I do not feel comfortable doing a literal translation of something if I don’t really understand what it means. In the introduction I will very briefly summarize some background information from my rebbe, and throughout the Kuntres, I will interject some commentary here and there, paraphrasing a few of my rebbe’s comments. As with any translation, the usual disclaimers apply; Any errors in explanation or translation are solely due to my mistakes, and are not to be attributed to the original Kuntres or my rebbe’s explanation.

Introduction:


According to Rav Moshe Avigdor Amiel, the chief rabbi of Tel Aviv, Chochma means the concept of “Hachlalah”. Hachlalah is the idea of generalizing, synthesizing many details into one coherent whole, and creating principals which animate the specific parts. It is the top-down approach, as opposed to the bottom-up approach. Chochma is the overarching principal, not the detail. Chochma is the male side. In the creation of a human being, the father supplies the ingredient necessary to make a whole person. He completes the code that contains the entire principal, the overarching DNA blueprint for the whole person.

He explains that Bina is “Hafrata.” Hafrata means bringing down the klal, the principal, into its specific application. Bina means taking the principal and applying it to each and every detail. It is the bottom-up approach, focusing on each detail and bringing down the klal, the principal, to apply it in all of the various details. In the creation of a human being, Bina is the female side. The male completes the code/blueprint for the whole person. But it is the mother, the female side that applies that code throughout the nine months of gestation to create and form each and every cell, organ and limb.

(This is also explained in my post entitled, How to Listen to Your Mother's Torah)

Quote from Perek 1 of Tanya:

"Behold the intellect of the intellectual soul is that which intellectually understands each thing. It is called Chochma [which stands for] "Koach [the ability to understand] What [something is]." And this ability is brought from the potential to the actual when one contemplates with his intellect to understand a thing to his satisfaction and to deepen it using some idea of Chochma which is understood with his intellect. This is called Bina. And these [Chochma and Bina] are the father and mother which give birth to love of Hashem, [as well as] awe and fear of Him."

Click here to continue on to Part 1 of the translation, which explains how Chochma and Bina are the root of the differences in nature between Sefardim and Ashkenazim.

-Dixie Yid

Monday, May 7, 2007

Bilvavi, "A Sanctuary in My Heart" available at Nehora


Thanks to a commenter at my post here, I have been made aware that you can get "A Sanctuary in My Heart," at Nehora at this link.

Enjoy!

-Dixie Yid

(Picture courtesy of Nehora, obviously)

Bilvavi.net is out with the beginning of Vol. 2's translation!


The folks at Bilvavi.net have let us know that the first few chapters of Bilvavi Mishkan Evneh are now available on their website.

Vol. 2's translation is available here.

You can also see my previous posts on this site here and here.

-Dixie Yid

Saturday, February 10, 2007

The Story Behind the Story, Part 3 (final section)

When the holy Rebbe from Kreminitz returned to his father's house, the holy Magid was sitting at his table, learning Torah, while a Gemara Sanhedrin was laying open on the table. When the holy Zlotchover noticed that his son had come, he asked him, "Mordechai, Were you in Koritz by Reb Pinchas? Don't be afraid. I already know. But tell me what he told you."

His son answered him by telling him that the reason for his sickness is because he is not eating cheese. The holy Magid answered him, "Good. I will accept upon myself to eat cheese. And what else did he tell you?" The holy Rebbe Reb Mordechai began to tell over everything as it happened, that the reason that his father was upset with the Rebbe from Koritz is because he (the Zlotchover) doesn't see his (Reb Pinchas Koritzer's) tefilos. But that he (Reb Pinchas) had dug out a tunnel straight to Hashem for his tefilos, and that he commanded me to request, in his name, that [you] look into the Gemara...

The holy Rebbe Reb Michel got up from his place and said, "Right now I am learning these very ideas. Open before me now is the Gemara Sanhedrin 42! I didn't know that he had already reached a level like that..."

The holy Rebbe from Chernobyl concluded his story [with those words] and said, "Moshe Rebeinu was not "bragging" by saying that he did not eat or drink. Just hte opposite! Moshe was intensly pained that all those days that he remained in Shamayim, those foods and drinks that he did not eat and did not drink did not come to their tikun, because he had not been able to lift them up to their root. And this is what he was saying to the Jewish people: See how precious you are before Hashem; that the water and the break waited for you twice for forty days and forty nights, and did not achieve their tikun... for your sake..."

Trusworthy ones: Become tzadikim together!

This wondorous story teaches us, between the lines, that just as Shamayim is higher than Aretz, so too are the ways and thoughts of the Tzadikim greater than our ways and our thoughts. Which brings us to the words of the holy Rebbe Reb Nachman from Breslov in his Sefer Likutei Moharan (Bachatzotzros, Siman 5 Seif 4): "Believe! That every dispute between perfect Tzadikim is nothing but [a device] to drive away the Sitra Achra... When you hear of disputes between Tzadikim, you should know that [Hashem] has having you hear [this] as a rebuke because you have blemished the "drops" in your brain... And certainly if you hadn't blemished your mind, you would not have heard of the disputes betwen Tzadikim. And that dispute exists only for your sake, in order that you should repent from death to life..."

His great student, the Holy Rebbe Reb Noson from Breslov said about this teaching, in his sefer Chayei Moharan: "This Torah, Batzatzotzros, was taught by [Rebbe Nachman] here on Rosh Hashana 5563 (1803), which was the first Rosh Hashana that he lived here, and that I was close to him.

In addition to the words of Rebbe Nachamn, [Rebbe Noson] adds a tradition from the Breslov Chassdidim, which was told over by the well known Mashpia, Rav Levi Yitzchok Bender, z'tl, in the name of his Rebbe, Rav Avrham ben Rav Nachman from Tolchin, z'tl, who was known for the exactness with which he receved the traditions from his Rebbeim

It was known that the father-in-law of the holy Rebbe Reb Noson, the holy Reb Dovid Tzvi Auerbach, z'tl, what was know as "The Gadol." He, like the misnagdim, was against the path of Chassidus, as opposed to his brother-in-law, the holy Rebbe Reb Nachman Horidenker, z'tl, the student of the Baal Shem Tov. This difference came about as a result of the dispute that existed between the students of the Baal Shem Tov; Namely the holy Rebbe Reb Pinchas Koritzer and the holy Magid Reb Yechiel Michel from Zlotchiv. Sometimes the Tzadik would give his son-in-law a hard time about this, that he would travel to Tzadikim like the Kedushas Levi, the holy Rebbe Reb Lipa from Chemenik, and Rav Shalom Pravitch, and he (Reb Noson's father-in-law)would say to him [tounge in cheek], "I believe in the words of both Tzadikim, and therefore I will not travel to either one!"

When Rav Noson first came to Breslov, this question truly bothered him, regarding the question of disputes between Tzadikim. And then when he heard this Torah (Bachatzotzros), it was like a soothing balm for his soul, because it answered his father-in-law's kasha regarding the behavior of Tzadikim who disagree with one another.

That is the end of the Breslov tradition; Because in seif 4 clarifies to Rav Noson the idea of disputes between Tzadikim. But a little investigation between the lines of this wondorous teaching will reveal to us a part of the story which is not known among Breslov Chassidim; The author of the Likutei Moharan hinted at the beginning of his Maamar, in seif 1, in a wondorous way, to the foundation of the dispute between the Tzadikim from Zlotchiv and Koritz, as it is received in the Belz-Chernobyl tradition:

This is how that Maamar begins, "Every person must say, The whole world was created only because of me. It comes out that when the world is created for my sake, I need to see and investigate at every moment regarding the tikun of the world and filling in what is missing in the world." These words contain an amazing hint about complaint of Rav Pinchas Koritzer against the Magid from Zlotchiv, who had stopped repairing the world and filling in what it was lacking with regard to cheese [by not] lifted it up to it's root.

And in the continuation of that same teaching: "One needs to encloth his tefilah, in order that the angels who stand to the left do not prosecute [against it]..." These words hint, without question, to the holy words of the Koritzer, who said in explaining himself, that he had dug for himself a tunnel straight to Hashem, in order that his tefillos not be touched by angels.

Therefore, the words of the Tzadikim are true, and trustworthy people proclaim them true together, the poor in one place and the rich in another place.
Tangentially, we see in the texts and different versions of the study that the way one can hide his tefilos from these prosecutions is to "encloth the tefilos in stories..."

The wise will hear and add more, to the other stories of Tzadikim, the students of the Baal Shem Tov, for all their generations.

Sunday, January 28, 2007

The Story Behind the Story, Part 2


The photograph is Rav Yissochar Dov of Belz, the father of Rav Aharon of Belz, mentioned in one of the stories brought down by the author of this article, Rav Areye Wohl, the Sudilkover Rebbe from Beit Shemesh.

True Magidim

In a letter written by Hagaon Harav Yoel Ashkenazi, z”tl, one of the elder Chassidim of Slonim in Tiveria, to the Rebbe from Toldos Aharon z”tl, the author of the Divrei Emunah, he says, “All of [my stories] I have heard from elders who stood on Har Sinai before Tzadikim upon whose merit the world is built, and who were extremely careful not to accept any story or event, unless [the one telling it over] is trustworthy.”

And therefore, in every single place there has been an exactness that all who pass down these stories be true Magidim. And on the whole, most stories were told over exactly, by Chassidim who were talmidei Chachamim, by direct oral tradition. It is like the statement which was once expressed by the holy rabbi, author of the, “Yesod Ha’avodah,” from Slonim regarding one of the “Story Tellers,” in his holy courtyard, that “if you would give him all of the wealth in the world, he would not change his stories.”

But if the exactitude is so great regarding the accuracy in telling over stories of Tzadikim, how has it happened that over the years, different traditions have been passed down, with different texts that contradict [each other in] many stories?! And as the holy Rebbe, the author of the “Shomer Emunim,” (page 28) “In truth, over the course of many years, many stories of Tzadikim have gotten switched, and they have changed, one from the other, and even the essence has changed sometimes from what originally happened.”

One of the answers given to this question is that of Hagaon Hakadosh from Satmar, z’tl, who explained: [Stories] are not like the words of the Torah, which are build into piles of Kashas and Terutzim with a clear structure and an understandable explanation. A story is a Ma’aseh Shehaya (a true life event) and it is the way of human beings to add a measure of their personal feelings into the story, to leave a little bit of the story out here, and add something somewhere else…

Compatible or Complimentary Stories?

After everything that has been said until now, it is interesting and touching to “stumble through,” each time as if it were the first through the traditions of various Chassidus’n, and through the well known stories in the different Chassidic Dynasties, which complement one another. This is as opposed to [studying] one Chassidus without any knowledge at all of the other side of the same story, passed down in the other [Chassidic] tradition.

An interesting example of this concept can be found in the following story, which is told over by the Chassidim of Belz:

In his youth, the holy Reb Aharon from Belz, z”tl, asked his father, the Rebbe Rav Yissochar Dov, z”tl, on parshas Eikev, when Moshe returns and tells the Jewish people about his ascent to Har Sinai: Moshe repeats the phrase, “Forty days and forty nights I have not eaten bread and I have not drunk water.” It would appear that this is a wondrous thing. Was this the main point of the greatness of the father of all Nevi’im?! Is not the mere fact that that he ascended into Shamayim and spoke with Hashem Yisborach face to face the most incredible and powerful [expression of] his greatness?! Why, then, does Moshe Rebbeinu put a find point on the fact that he did not eat bread or drink water?

His father answered him by saying, “You have asked a good question! And I will answer your question with a story about your great grandfather, after whom you were named, the holy Rebbe Reb Aharon from Chernobyl, z”tl.

After I got married, said the Rebbe Reb Yissochar Dov, I relied [for my sustenance] on the table of my father in law, my elder, the holy Rebbe, Rav Aharon from Chernobyl, z”tl, who, as it is know, was a person with the sweetest tongue, and an amazing story teller. One day, my father in law was sitting after Shacharis, and he began to tell stories of Tzadikim, and everyone present, and I among them, stood around him like a wall, to these secrets of the holy Serafim.

Many hours passed by, and our Rebbe was still sitting there, crowned by his Talis, and giving over these stories. The time for breakfast and lunch had already passed, and the entire crowd were still standing in place without a movement. “All flesh was still…” They drank, with thirst, his words. No one made quivered or made a move because of their great longing, and no one felt “a hunger for bread nor a thirst for water, but only to hear the words of Hashem.”

It was only when the sun began to descend low down into the sky, close to Shkia, one of the Chassidim built up his bravery and asked [your] question: Please Rebbe, teach us! What is added by Moshe Rebeinu, a”h, who said ‘bread I have not eaten, and water I have not drunk…’? The Rebbe is sitting here and is speaking to us for many hours holy stories and amazing tales, and we do not at all feel the need to eat or drink, and not one person has left. How much the more so, Moshe Rebeinu, who was benefiting from the Divine light of the Shechina, , and speaking with Hashem face to face, and receiving the Torah from the mouth of Hashem, would he possibly have had any need for food or drink???”

The holy Rebbe Reb Aharon from Chernobyl answered him also with a story:

It is known that there was a machlokes between the holy Magid, the Rebbe Reb Yechiel Michel from Zlochiv, z”tl, and the holy Rebbe Reb Pinchas Koritzer, z”tl.

One day the holy Magid from Zlochiv fell ill. His son, the holy Rebbe Reb Mordechai from Kreminetz, z”tl, sought out the face of the Tzadik from Koritz, in order that he daven to Hashem for his holy father, that he should return to his health and be healed. However, he knew, that his father would not be pleased with this trip, so he got up and traveled secretly, without asking the (customary) travelers bracha from his father.

Obviously, when he got to Koritz, he didn’t tell anyone who he or is father was. However, immediately upon his entrance into the holy [home of Rav Pinchas Koritzer], before he had even put out his had in greeting, Rav Pinchas spoke up first and said, “I know who you are, and that you have come to me because your father is sick. [This has happened because] as part of your father’s holy avodah, he has forbidden the eating of cheese to himself. Please tell him; That he should take upon himself to eat cheese, and he will get better. This is because cheese has come to Shamayim with a claim [against your father]. Since the time he stopped eating cheese, there is no Tzadik in the world who is doing the good work of bringing cheese to it’s ultimate tikun. And because of this claim against him, and this prosecution, this sickness has been decreed upon him.

Before Rav Mordechai left, the Rebbe Reb Pinchas Koritzer added one thing: “Tell your father, that I know that he holds contempt for me in his heart, because he does not see my Tefilos in Shamayim. But know; that not only does he not see my tefilos, but even the angels and Serafim, who accept tefilos do not see my tefilos, since I have paved a path for my tefilos straight to the Holy One… But I know that when you tell him this, he will not accept my words. So tell him in my name; ‘There is not thing that is not hinted to in the Torah.’ And he will forgive me if [I ask you to] open up a Gemara Sanhedrin 44a. There it is written: ‘And Pinchas davened (vayipaleil) and the plague was stopped.’ Rebbe Elazar says: It does not say, ‘vayispalel.’ Rather, it says ‘Vayipaleil.” This teaches that he made davening [only] with the Creator.” ([והכתיב] (תהילים קו) ויעמד פנחס ויפלל ותעצר המגפה ואמר ר' אלעזר ויתפלל לא נאמר אלא ויפלל מלמד שעשה פלילות עם קונו )This means that the Tefilos of Pinchas were hidden from everyone else’s eyes, and they were only visible to Hakadosh Baruch Hu, because he made the davening with his Creator, alone.”

Click here for Part 3.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

The Story Behind the Story, Part 1


Here is Part 1 of a translation I'm working on for A Simple Jew. It's an article written by his Rebbe, the Sudilkover Rebbe. It concerns stories about Tzadikim, and those disputes that sometimes exist between those stories and between Tzadikim. There will probably be 4 or 5 parts total to this translation.

Question:

What is the purpose of stories about Tzadikim? Does every story need to be told? How do the traditions of various Chassidic Dynasties complement one another? What is the meaning of a dispute between Tzadikim? These topics and more will be discussed in the following essay. (Rav Areye Wohl (the Sudilkover Rebbe) - July 19, 2005 - 4:36)

Our holy sages have already revealed to us the great value in telling over the praises and wonders of Tzadikim. Many purposes are given for this. One is to show their greatness and praise them, which is a mitzva. And a second reason is to become inspired by their actions and to learn from them how to ascend the path going up to the house of Hashem. Another purpose stands right before our eyes; to increase our emunah in Hashem and in His servants, the Tzadikim, in order that all people should know that there exists a G-d who judges the world.

My great-grandfather, the Degel Machaneh Ephraim, zy”a, brought down another purpose for telling over stories [of Tzadikim]. “According to what I heard from my father, my master, the BeShT, zt”l, who would tell over stories and secular observations, and with these he would serve Hashem with his clear, pure wisdom…” (Degel Machaneh Ephraim, parshas Vayeshev, “Od Yesh Lomar Sherimeiz”) And similarly, I saw in many of the seforim of the students of the holy BeShT; [regarding] the greatness of the avodah and the sweetening of judgment [that take place in telling] holy stories.

Story as Educational Tool

For these reasons, stories of Tzadikim have taken a place of honor, both at the holy tables of great men of Yisroel and in the holy sichos of the Baalei Musar, as well as on Jewish bookshelves, which greatly enrich [us] with the stories of the generations and holy ways of Tzadikim.

In general, stories of Tzadikim are used as an unending wellspring in the field of Chinuch. It is well know that the Rebbe Reb Itzik’l from Pshevorsk, z”tl, told over [the following story]; One time he asked the holy Rebbe, the Divrei Chaim of Tzantz, who taught young children, [the following question] “Do you learn words of Musar and Yiras Shamayim with the children?” After thinking about his words, he clarified: “I am referring to the stories about Reb Elimelech [of Lizensk] and the Rebbe Reb Zusha [of Anapoli].”

All generations have made generous use of stories of Tzadikim as an inseparable part of raising the youth of our flock. Every Jewish mother has a sack full of Midrashim and stories of Tzadikim, which have passed from generation to generation, and have remained a constant escort to the activites and bedtime comforts of Jewish children. Similarly, stories of Tzadikim have been a powerful tool in the hands of Magidim and great men of Chassidus, to pass over a clear message to their listeners by telling over a great story, [and thereby] giving over wisdom along with it.

As an example of a story like this, there is a story about a Chassid who went to see the holy Rebbe Reb Yisroel from Ruzhin, z”tl. This Jew had descended a little too much into the curse of “b’zeyas apecha tochal lechem.” The Tzadik told this Chassid about a Jew who was very particular not to engage in any business before noon. Until then, he sat and toiled in Torah, and he didn’t let anyone interrupt him, or distract him from this practice. After a while, he had various difficulties with is parnasa, and his store had a lot of excess merchandise worth a large amount of money, but he couldn’t find any buyers…

One day has he was heading to the Beis Hamedrash, a carriage stopped beside him, and inside was an important Poritz. He turned to the Jew and asked him if he knows a certain Jewish merchant in the town. “I’m that man,” answered the Jewish merchant. “If so, I want to buy the merchandise sitting in your store,” answered the Poritz. The Jew refused, claiming that it was his inviolate rule to only learn Torah until noon. The Poritz offered him higher than market price, but the merchant still refused. It got to the point where the Goy finally named a price twice the value of the merchandise he had in the store. However the Jew stood by his refusal, and did not agree to sell, until he finished his regular daily learning schedule. He then turned, and went to the Beis Medresh…

And with these words, the holy Rebbe from Ruzhin ended the story. The Chassid asked the Rebbe, “And what happened at the end of the story?!” The Rebbe answered him with a rebuking gaze, “The merchant in the story is not interested in how the story ends. But you [who isn’t even a Baal Davar in the story] cares how the story ends!?”

Trustworthy Stories

Sometimes we stumble upon stories that, even though they perhaps give us something to learn about the greatness of Tzadikim, raise various types of questions. It is written in the holy sefer, the Noam Elimelech (Parshas Bo “Oh Yomar Dabru”) “One should constantly tell [stories] of great Tzadikim, and always count their straight midos… But the Torah warns one who wants to cling to this midah, not to exaggerate the middos of a Tzadik…”

The holy Rebbe from Munkach, the “Minchas Elazar,” in his sefer “Divrei Torah,” and the holy Gaon, the “Divrei Yoel,” from Satmar z”tl, did much work to uproot stories that are not compatible with halacha, or are likely to cause weakness in Avodas Hashem, chas veshalom.

In the courtyards of many Chassidic Dynasties they were very careful, especially on the day of the Hillulah [of a certain Tzadik], to only tell over his good practices and his ways in Avodas Hashem, and not stories of his wonders. And I heard from one of the Tzadikim of our generation, Shlita, who heard from one of the elder Mashpi’im of Chabad in the previous generation [an explanation of the following] pasuk; “And he will give you a sign (Ose) or a wonder…” If there is a Tzadik from whom it is possible to learn even one letter (Ose) of Torah, you do not need to tell over wonders about him…

Click here for Part 2.